ohio farm bureau federation

News & Events

Text Size - + print article

AFBF President Bob Stallman statement on Climate Change

Published Jun. 25, 2009 | Discuss this article on Facebook
This article has 1 Comment

WASHINGTON, D.C., June 24, 2009—“Climate change legislation working its way to a vote on the House floor this week continues to be seriously flawed. The bill’s provisions and omissions are very problematic for U.S. agriculture, our national economy and domestic energy security. Even after the stellar efforts of House Agriculture Chairman Collin Peterson and many rural members of Congress to win vital changes for America’s farm and ranch families – efforts that we strongly endorse and support – there are simply too many flaws in the underlying bill. Peterson has shown once again that he is a determined advocate for America’s farmers and ranchers and a leader to be reckoned with in the halls of Congress. 

 

“But this legislation raises a wide range of issues that are detrimental to U.S. agriculture. One of the chief challenges is the energy deficit the bill will create. New technologies hold great promise for our nation, but are nowhere close to coming on line. The bill forces agriculture and other productive sectors of our nation’s economy into a position of severe competitive disadvantage with trading partners like China and other nations who will not burden their economies to control carbon emissions.

 

“Despite inclusion of Chairman Peterson’s hard-fought provisions to reward farmers for carbon offsets and to remove the phony indirect-land-use calculation, this bill should be amended further or defeated.”

 

Text Size - + print article

Member Comments (1)

Robert Koerner said:
Gentlemen, There is no way that this bill can be amended that would make it acceptable. The idea that controlling carbon will influence the climate is unproven and we in agriculture should have nothing to do with it. Taxing carbon would devastate agriculture as well as the rest of the economy. What the economy needs above all is abundant, affordable, dependable energy and none of the renewable energy sources meets these criteria so stop subsidizing them. Using renewable energy is going backward. Our first energy was renewable -- wood. We progressed from wood to coal oil gas and now nuclear. We should use our own abundant supplies of coal, oil, gas and nuclear which should require no subsidies if the government would get out of the way. By the time that our carbon based energy becomes in short supply, the free market will have found new sources. Robert Koerner flag as improper
Posted Jun. 26, 2009

Leave a Comment