Livestock farmers seek consistent processing rules

As a livestock producer who grew up helping out at the family’s small meat processing facility, Nate Like tends to hear stories about problems at the facilities. And increasingly, the Henry County Farm Bureau president has been hearing the same story over and over again—livestock producers who are having trouble getting their animals harvested. For some producers, the closest meat processor is too booked up or too far away. Others describe inconsistent enforcement of state regulations with some saying they are too rigid.

Every chance Like gets, he talks to local legislators whether it’s on his farm, at local meetings or in the nation’s capital. During the county Farm Bureau presidents trip to Washington, D.C. last year, he spent several minutes talking with U.S. Rep. Bob Latta about a friend who raised a steer that was born blind but otherwise healthy, as confirmed by his veterinarian. When he took the animal to be processed, he was told blind animals can’t be used for human consumption. The steer wasn’t allowed to return to its owner and was euthanized and discarded.

Under Ohio law, there are certain conditions in which livestock may be condemned during an ante-mortem inspection. These state laws follow federal regulations that are in place to protect public health, businesses and the livestock industry. For example, the U.S. Department of Agriculture has banned sick, blind and non-ambulatory cattle from human consumption in an attempt to assure that cattle inflicted with Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, otherwise known as “mad cow disease, do not get into the food chain.

“Under federal law, state meat and poultry inspection programs must be ‘at least equal to’ USDA’s federal program,” said Dr. Nick Wagner, chief of the Division of Meat Inspection at the Ohio Department of Agriculture. “ODA takes this obligation very seriously because we know how important it is to provide Ohio’s small meat and poultry processors an avenue to do business. The failure to follow state and federal law could ultimately put the entire program in jeopardy.”

“It all comes back to food safety and I’m a big proponent of that. But there needs to be some common sense,” Like said.

In agreement is Mark Ballmer, policy chair for Fulton County Farm Bureau. He’s been talking with Ohio Sen. Randy Gardner and state Farm Bureau staff members about the problem in his area. For example, he said a member’s cow broke its leg when it got caught in a processing plant gate. Because it couldn’t get up unassisted, the cow was declared unfit for human consumption, not allowed to return to its owner and was euthanized.

“There was nothing wrong with the animal. It just had the misfortune of breaking its leg at the plant,” Ballmer said. “This has been a big issue in our area. Before, maybe they were too lax (in enforcing rules), but now there’s no lax.”

OFBF state staff have been discussing members’ concerns with Wagner and the Ohio Association of Meat Processors. In response, ODA developed training guides for meat processing plants to ensure uniform enforcement of rules, developed educational materials and reached out to the livestock industry about state and federal regulations. It is working with processing plants on when it’s more appropriate to issue a noncompliance report for a violation instead of stopping all operations at the plant for a short period of time when any issue arises.

“Our ultimate goal is to uniformly regulate the industry in a fair, consistent and professional manner,” Wagner said. “We do this to protect the health of the public, ensure the success of Ohio’s meat and poultry businesses and the success of the livestock industry as a whole.”

An upcoming edition of Buckeye Farm News will take a look at the capacity of Ohio’s meat processing industry.

In response to concerns from livestock producers, the Ohio Department of Agriculture developed training guides for meat processing plants to ensure uniform enforcement of rules, developed educational materials and reached out to the livestock industry about state and federal regulations.

Photo caption: Farm Bureau member Nate Like (right) discusses regulations regarding livestock processing with Rep. Bob Latta.

One thought on “Livestock farmers seek consistent processing rules

  1. Avatar Keith Pritchard says:

    Not a fan of ODA Food Safety Division they lack ethics and knowledge. Wine kills human pathogens and has no history of food safety issues, and since licensing passed in a 2009 budget bill (by surprise) we have been subject to food processing licensing and regulation by the Ohio Department of Agriculture. This is duplicate of licensing and regulation as provided in Ohio liquor codes. Many other states exempt from this sort of duplicate licensing and regulation. Ohio’s regulation is superfluous, unnecessary, duplicate and also discriminates against Ohio wineries by wineries from out of state that are not subject to the same food processing licensing and regulatory costs that sell wholesale in Ohio. As a traditional artisan winemaker that values microbial diversity in the winery environment I also find the regulation is in direct opposition to my winemaking principles. or

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *