Applications for Ohio Farm Bureau Health Plans now available
Members have three ways to apply: contacting a certified agent, calling 833-468-4280 or visiting ohiofarmbureauhealthplans.org.
Read More
Ohio State University Extension Agricultural and Resource Law Program has compiled a publication that explains the proposed Lake Erie Bill of Rights, which is shared on the program’s Ag Law Blog. This new “In the Weeds” in-depth resource answers questions about the ballot proposal and was written by Peggy Kirk Hall, Ellen Essman, and Evin Bachelor.
Some excerpts from the analysis:
LEBOR is a proposed amendment to the Toledo City Charter. The “Toledoans for Safe Water” initiated the LEBOR petition to amend Toledo’s city charter. A “charter” is like a “constitution” in that it outlines a city’s powers and how the city will function. The Ohio Constitution allows city residents to propose charter amendments through a petition process that requires signatures by 10 percent or more of the electors in order to place a proposal on the ballot.
A look at the LEBOR petition. The LEBOR petition attempts to create a new way for Toledo citizens to protect the Lake Erie resource by granting new legal rights for Lake Erie, its ecosystem and allowing Toledo and its residents to enforce those legal rights against any government or corporation that violates them. This document goes into detail on the three primary parts of the petition.
Who has rights in Lake Erie? The State of Ohio owns the Ohio portion of Lake Erie in trust for the people of Ohio and a city cannot usurp the State’s sovereign rights in Lake Erie without the State’s express permission. The State of Ohio’s rights in Lake Erie stem from its inherent powers as a sovereign signatory to the United States Constitution. That is a high status for the State of Ohio, but cities lack sovereign status because cities are creatures of the state according to federal constitutional law. In exercising its power as a sovereign over portions of Lake Erie, Ohio designated the Ohio Department of Natural Resources as the state’s only designee “in any matter pertaining to the care, protection, and enforcement of the state’s rights” in Lake Erie. LEBOR attempts to claim rights from the State of Ohio and transfer them to Toledo and its residents, but there is no legal authority for doing so. Much like Ohio, the State of Michigan also holds its portion in trust for its people, and the Canadian Province of Ontario governs the portion of Lake Erie north of the international boundary.
LEBOR and the rights of corporations. LEBOR states that a government or corporation, defined as any business entity, may not violate the rights of Lake Erie and also declares that corporations “shall not possess any other legal rights that would interfere with LEBOR, including the right to assert state or federal preemptive laws.” While controversial, courts have adhered to a long line of decisions that grant “personhood” and certain constitutional rights to corporations. Specifically, courts have determined that the U.S. Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause, which requires that the law treat all individuals in the same manner as others, applies to corporations because corporations exist to protect the interests of their owners and therefore must be able to assert those interests in litigation. LEBOR’s focus on enforcement against corporations but not individuals and its removal of legal rights for corporations appears to directly conflict with such legal precedent.
What does it all mean? The LEBOR initiative is similar to many other community rights proposals that seek to establish rights of nature that community members can protect through legal action. Such efforts have a bad track record in courts nationwide. Courts have consistently determined that the provisions conflict with longstanding constitutional principles that address the relationship between federal, state and local governments; state and local governments cannot eliminate federal rights and local governments cannot deny rights granted by the state. Community rights initiatives also conflict with legal precedent established by the U.S. Supreme Court that guarantees corporate entities constitutional rights. Finally, the State of Ohio holds rights in Lake Erie that Toledo and its residents do not have legal authority to claim. Based upon these legal precedents, it is likely that an Ohio court would not enforce or uphold a LEBOR action.
Peggy Kirk Hall is an Associate Professor of Agricultural & Resource Law for OSU
Ellen Essman is a Sr. Research Associate for OSU’s Agricultural & Resource Law Program
Evin Bachelor is the Law Fellow for OSU’s Agricultural & Resource Law Program
My first recommendation in your journey is to start out with a local farming friend or mentor along with joining an organization like Ohio Farm Bureau.
We’re just so thankful for the Farm Bureau and the foundation for helping put this together. And of course, the Boyert family for the vision they had with this grant. It’s jumping us forward 10 years. It’s unbelievable.
I could not have done it without the resources I have found through Farm Bureau.
It wasn’t until I joined the Wilmington College Collegiate Farm Bureau that I truly saw how my passion could translate into leadership, advocacy and a career.
The issue of property taxation remains as one of the biggest challenges our members face today. Ensuring agricultural property is valued for its agricultural potential and not development is critical to the continued success of Ohio agriculture.
Through the Select Partner program, we became educated in farm insurance and weren't just selling policies. It became more and more clear why farmers need an advocate like Ohio Farm Bureau.
So many of the issues that OFBF and its members are advocating for are important to all Ohioans. I look at OFBF as an agricultural watchdog advocating for farmers and rural communities across Ohio.
Featured Articles
Farm safety vs. risk management: What’s the difference and why it matters
Farm safety and risk management are deeply interconnected, forming the foundation of a resilient and sustainable operation.
Read More
Ohio Farm Bureau applauds Gov. DeWine dyed diesel executive order
The executive order waives state penalties and suspends discretionary enforcement related to the use of dyed diesel on public highways through Dec. 31, 2026.
Read More
Growing our Generation: Representing Ohio in Charlotte
Maggie Preston, Lincoln Deitrick and Denver Davis describe their role in agriculture, their Farm Bureau involvement and what it means to win their respective state awards.
Read More
Legal with Leah: Changes to Fuel Taxes and Dyed Diesel Regulation
Associate General Counsel Leah Curtis breaks down the changes to Ohio’s fuel tax, recent guidance on dyed diesel and what farm families need to know.
Read More
Gripp business solution to establish Ohio test group
Gripp is launching a 60-day cohort in mid-January for Ohio Farm Bureau members, offering discounted access to its asset-tracking app.
Read More