One of the most controversial topics involving agriculture and the food supply is Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs). Genetically Modified Organisms are living beings that have had their genetic code changed in some way. While I personally feel that GMOs are necessary to increase yields which is needed to feed the growing population of the world and to combat diseases and insects, I also feel that it is everyone’s right to choose the types of products they use.

In order to know what is in our products, we utilize labels right? Labels can be a great source for knowing what is in your food, nutrition facts, who produces the food, and even where it comes from. In 2016, Congress passed a bill that established a federal standard for labeling foods that have been made with genetically modified organisms. The bill requires food manufacturers to use one of three types of labels to inform consumers when GMO ingredients are in their products: a statement on the package, directions to a website or a phone number, or a QR code.

Labels can be great…but labels can also be misleading (which I still to this day don’t understand because of laws that say labels cannot be “false or misleading” but I’ll save that rant for another day). The FDA requires the labeling, but food producers have relative freedom in how they go about providing the customers with the required information. Ever heard of the Non-GMO project and seen its  butterfly label? I grabbed a gallon of ”name brand” orange juice out of the cooler at the grocery store, branding a Non-GMO Project -Verified seal on its label. Here is the issue, this particular brand is 100% orange juice..and there are no commercially grown genetically engineered oranges. NONE. ZIP. ZERO. NONEXISTANT.  Every brand of orange juice is naturally “non-GMO,” provided the only ingredient is oranges, which this particular orange juice was 100% orange juice. Seems pretty false and misleading to me. The Non-GMO project is out of control – with almost 50,000 products bearing that label. Kitty litter, salt, and more!

With all that being said, labeling guidance provided by USDA FSIS explains the following labeling terms as:

Not genetically modified” or “Non-genetically modified. The term “genetic modification” encompasses a broad range of methods that can be used to alter the genetic composition of a plant. FDA’s longstanding position has been that the term has traditionally been used broadly to signify the alteration of the genotype of a plant using any technique, new or traditional. The term “modification,” in this context means the alteration in the genetic composition of a plant that results from adding, deleting, or changing hereditary traits, irrespective of the method. Modifications may be minor, such as a single mutation that affects one gene, or major alterations of genetic material derived from conventional breeding (e.g., selection) that affect many genes. Because the term “genetically modified” can encompass any alteration to the genetic composition of a plant, including alterations achieved through traditional hybridization or breeding techniques, that term could apply to most cultivated food crops since most food crops are the product of selective breeding.

GMO free,” “GE free,” “does not contain GMOs,” “non-GMO,” and similar claims. The term “free” conveys zero or total absence unless a regulatory definition has been put in place. FDA recommends that manufacturers not use food labeling claims that indicate that a food is “free” of ingredients derived through the use of biotechnology. Instead, FDA recommends that manufacturers consider the use of other types of statements to indicate that plant-derived food has not been produced using bioengineering.

What foods are genetically modified you ask? You may be surprised that the list of genetically modified crops available in the United States and Canada only contain eight crops. That is right only eight!  Those are corn (both field and sweet), soybeans, cotton, canola, alfalfa, sugar beets, papaya and squash. Three more have been approved but are not available on the market yet: arctic apples, innate potato, and aqua bounty salmon.

Go forth, conquer the grocery store, share what you learned, and don’t let someone brag about their oranges or 100% real orange juice being GMO free because, well there are no GMO oranges.

Mandy Orahood is an Ohio Farm Bureau Organization Director serving Ashtabula, Geauga, Lake, and Trumbull Counties. Mandy can be reached at [email protected].

 

Labor has always been an issue, mainly because we are a seasonal operation. So that's a challenge finding somebody who only wants to work three months out of a year, sometimes up to six months.
Mandy Way's avatar
Mandy Way

Way Farms

Farm Labor Resources
I appreciate the benefit of having a strong voice in my corner. The extras that are included in membership are wonderful, but I'm a member because of the positive impact to my local and state agricultural communities.
Ernie Welch's avatar
Ernie Welch

Van Wert County Farm Bureau

Strong communities
I see the value and need to be engaged in the community I live in, to be a part of the decision-making process and to volunteer with organizations that help make our community better.
Matt Aultman's avatar
Matt Aultman

Darke County Farm Bureau

Leadership development
Farm Bureau involvement has taught me how to grow my professional and leadership experience outside of the workforce and how to do that in a community-centric way.
Jaclyn De Candio's avatar
Jaclyn De Candio

Clark County Farm Bureau

Young Ag Professionals program
With not growing up on a farm, I’d say I was a late bloomer to agriculture. I feel so fortunate that I found the agriculture industry. There are so many opportunities for growth.
Jenna Gregorich's avatar
Jenna Gregorich

Coshocton County Farm Bureau

Growing our Generation
Knowing that horticulture is under the agriculture umbrella and having Farm Bureau supporting horticulture like it does the rest of ag is very important.
Jared Hughes's avatar
Jared Hughes

Groovy Plants Ranch

Groovy Plants Ranch
If it wasn't for Farm Bureau, I personally, along with many others, would not have had the opportunity to meet with our representatives face to face in Washington.
Austin Heil's avatar
Austin Heil

Hardin County Farm Bureau

Washington, D.C. Leadership Experience
So many of the issues that OFBF and its members are advocating for are important to all Ohioans. I look at OFBF as an agricultural watchdog advocating for farmers and rural communities across Ohio.
Mary Smallsreed's avatar
Mary Smallsreed

Trumbull County Farm Bureau

Advocacy
Suggested Tags: